Biblical Words [669]
Holy
places are hidden from profane eyes, and people blessed by God’s Spirit live
side by side with the unrighteous.
Genesis 28:10-19a.
The Torah reading presents Jacob’s dream – and his “ladder” – at
Bethel .
Last Sunday’s reading showed Jacob
outwitting his not very bright brother Esau, but now he has had to run away from
Esau and his parental home to save his life.
That brings him to spend the night at a place that is secretly holy, a
place later called Bethel , that is,
beth-El, the “house” of the high-god
El.
The
Holy Place .
The ancestor stories in Genesis not only established kinship lines and
tribal friends and enemies in the greater Israelite world, they also identified
and sanctioned holy places. In the critical events of their wanderings
the ancestors encountered awesome and numinous powers. To name such powers and to mark them
as sacred places was work that belonged to the ancestors. Later generations did not discover new holy
places; they were guided by those ancient encounters with the holy, and they
revered and enhanced the great sanctuaries that the ancestors had
discovered.
Jacob’s vision at Bethel
is an archetypal example of a sanctuary
legend. In the dream Jacob sees a sullam, a word occurring only here in
the Hebrew Bible. Let’s dwell a little
on this word that gave us “Jacob’s Ladder.”
The Greek translators used the word
klimax, which means a scaling ladder
(which was slanted toward the wall of the besieged city) or a stairway, and
that Greek is probably the source, through Latin, of the English “ladder.” For the Hebrew sullam, the older Brown-Driver-Briggs
lexicon (1906) gave simply “ladder” as the meaning, but more recent Hebrew
lexicons, with more comparative material from other Semitic languages, give the
meaning “stepped ramp, flight of steps” (Koehler-Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old
Testament, Study Ed., tr. M.E.J. Richardson, Leiden: Brill, 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 757-58.) What the word probably meant in Israelite
times was a staircase running from the ground up the side of a temple
tower, perhaps to some landings part-way up, and then to the most holy
sanctuary on the very top of the sacred mountain. The model is the Mesopotamian ziggurat, which is also reflected in the
plan for the tower of Babel
“with its top in the heavens” (Genesis 11:4).
In Jacob’s dream the top of this
staircase (“ladder”) reached to heaven – the most holy place at the top – and
the messengers of the gods (“angel” means messenger in both Hebrew and Greek)
went up and down this stairway carrying orders from the heavenly council to all
parts of the land. This was the vision
in Jacob’s dream, that this very spot was secretly the place where the high god
of heaven conducted business, where all the critical decisions for the human
realm were made and set underway.
Reconstruction of a Mesopotamian ziggurat, based on surviving ruins.
Jacob makes the appropriate responses. He confesses the revelation. “Surely there is Yahweh in this place — and I
did not know it!” (my translation). He has the appropriate fear before the
numinous. “How awesome is this
place! This is none other than the house
of God [Elohim], and this is the gate of heaven” (verse 17, NRSV).
Jacob then set up the stone that had
been under his head and made it a maṣṣṣebah
(“pillar”), one of those sacred standing stones that the Judeans would later
hate and destroy. And he poured oil on
the top of this stone, anointing it as Moses anointed the Tabernacle when he
sanctified it for holy use (Exodus 40:9).
The
Promises. In the midst of all this
sanctity of the place, however, the Lord had spoken some powerful words to
Jacob in the dream.
Everything that had been promised to
Abraham is here promised to Jacob, as if for the first time: (1) “…the land on which you lie I will give
to you and to your offspring”; (2) “your offspring shall be like the dust of
the earth, and you [they] shall spread abroad to the west and to the east and
to the north and to the south”; and (3) “all the families of the earth shall be
blessed in you and in your offspring” (verses 13-14). With this IOU in hand, Jacob can set himself
up as a great figure of destiny without reference to Abraham.
There is, of course, a promise more
specific to Jacob’s own situation – as Abraham had a promise specifically about
his own son.
Jacob’s promise is that God will
take care of him and give him prosperity on his journey to the old country,
which lies ahead of him (verse 15). In
the ending of the passage, not included in the Lectionary reading, Jacob makes
a deal with the God of Bethel. If he
will protect Jacob and bring him back safely to Bethel ,
Jacob will establish that sanctuary and support it with a tithe of his goods
(Genesis 28:20-22).
Twenty years later, when Jacob is
rich and has a large family, he makes a proper pilgrimage to Bethel, builds an
altar, and worships the God who did it all for him (Genesis 35:1-15). The promise to the fleeing refugee had been
fulfilled, and he in turn paid his dues.
Psalm 139:1-12, 23-24.
The Psalm reading is very appropriate to the Jacob story, appropriate
to a character who has formerly practiced deception (in his relations with
Esau) but is now ready to take a new path.
This psalm is a profound meditation
on the God who knows the whole of the inner person, the God who searches
hearts. At Bethel Jacob realizes
that he can have no secrets from God.
“You know when I sit down and when I rise up; …You search out my path
and my lying down, / and are acquainted with all my ways” (verses 2-3, NRSV).
The speaker also realizes that there
is no escaping from God. “Where can I go
from your spirit?” (verse 7). Up to
heaven, down to Sheol, off to the vast distances of the east (“the wings of the
morning,” KJV) or to the far west (“the furthest limits of the sea”) – none
will succeed. “Even there your hand
shall lead me, / and your right hand shall hold me fast” (verses 8-10).
Finally Jacob surrenders. “Search me, O God, and know my heart; ... See
if there is any wicked way in me, / and lead me in the way everlasting” (verses
23-24).
He is now ready to travel to the
distant land and trust entirely and without reservation to God’s care while
there.
The Epistle reading continues Paul’s exposition of the new life in the
Spirit.
He finishes the contrast between
life in the Spirit and the old life in the flesh. Here the old life is the life of slavery,
while the new life is that of children who are members of the family, rather than slaves. Those living in the Spirit are children of
God by adoption, and in the Spirit they are empowered to cry out “Abba” to the
Father, virtually calling God “Daddy.”
Only privileged children of the household can take such liberties, and
it is the power of God’s Spirit dwelling in one that bestows such privileges
(verses 14-17). (Paul's world was very charismatic, filled with outbursts of spiritual ecstasy. See I Corinthians 14:1-33.)
In the middle of the reading there
is a transition, a transition from the present freedom from slavery to the glory that lies ahead. In the present, those living in the Spirit
still share the sufferings that the world lays on Jesus and his followers, but
Paul urges that those sufferings are nothing compared to what awaits them. The created world, which has been confined to
frustration by the era of sin and wickedness, yearns to “be delivered from the
bondage of corruption” so that it can obtain “the glorious liberty of the
children of God” (verse 21, NKJV).
Thus the whole creation – the good
earth – shares in the hope of the Spirited ones, and together they look for the
glorious consummation (of which we will hear more in next week’s reading).
The Gospel reading continues Matthew’s parables of the kingdom.
We are in that section of Matthew’s
Gospel (chapters 11-13) in which sharp opposition has arisen against
Jesus. The Pharisees have begun to plan
how to kill Jesus (12:14 ) and Jesus
has begun to teach that many are doomed to exclusion from the blessings of the
kingdom. The parables are appropriate to
this section of the Gospel because they repeatedly show the division between
the lost and the saved.
The
original parable of the Weeds. (The
weeds are called “tares” in the King James version.) If this parable has a “single point,” as good
parables are supposed to, it must be that the good and the wicked grow together
in the world until the judgment of the kingdom comes. All preliminary attempts to separate the
righteous from the evil cannot succeed, or are not in accord with God’s will,
though one may be confident that there will be a time of separation, a final
judgment. This is the parable as
originally told by Jesus to all hearers in verses 24-30.
The
parable allegorized. Later Jesus
holds a closed seminar in which he explains the more secret meaning of the
parable (verses 36-43). This secret
meaning explicitly turns the parable into an allegory. Jesus provides a set of equivalents for the
actors of the parable.
The one planting the good seed in
the field in the first place is the Son of Man.
The field itself is the world, the good seed are “the children of the
kingdom” while the weeds are “the children of the evil one.” The enemy who sowed the weeds is the devil,
the harvest is the time of judgment, and the harvesters who separate the weeds
and burn them are the angels commanded by the Son of Man. The conclusion (verse 43) is a shining world
freed of the evil-doers who until then have lived in the world in safety side
by side with the righteous.
If the parable was not told in the
first place to suggest something like this allegory, it certainly invited
development in that direction. Jesus
certainly did proclaim a coming judgment.
He also insisted that many people whom the world takes for “sinners” are
in fact those qualified for the kingdom – that is, are mixed with everybody
else in the world at large. Thus, there
is no easy way to tell sinners from saints.
The good people spoken of in the Beatitudes will certainly be separated
from the haughty, the self-righteous, the violent – and possibly even the
“rich,” as Luke heard the Beatitudes – when the time comes.
The parable giver and the parable
interpreter are not in two different camps.
The interpreter may have his opponents more sharply in sight, and he may
think the harvest is delayed a bit more, but he seeks to keep Jesus’ teaching
true to the kingdom message.
No comments:
Post a Comment